This exposed a few bugs which caused the following tests to behave
incorrectly:
- `tab-size-text-wrap.html`: This previously relied on a bug where we
incorrectly treated `white-space: pre` as allowing text wrapping. The
fix here is to implement the text-wrap CSS shorthand property.
- `execCommand-preserveWhitespace.html`: We don't correctly serialize
shorthand properties. This is covered by an existing FIXME in
`CSSStyleProperties::serialized()`
- `white-space-shorthand.html`: The last 5 subtests here fail as we
don't correctly handle shorthand properties in
`CSSStyleProperties::remove_property()`. This is covered by an
existing FIXME in said function.
We have implemented all commands in the editing spec that potentially
reference one another, so we can now rely on the fact that any command
that gets passed to these methods has a definition. User-provided
commands still get checked by means of `queryCommandSupported()` and
friends.
No functional changes.
Major browsers seem to preserve `white-space: pre/pre-wrap` styles in a
`<div>` when deleting the current selection through an editing command.
The idiomatic way to support this is to have a command with a "relevant
CSS property" to make sure the value is recorded and restored where
appropriate, however, no such command exists.
Create a custom command (internal to Ladybird) that implements this
behavior.
This reworks EventHandler so text insertion, backspace, delete and
return actions are now handled by the Editing API. This was the whole
point of the execCommand spec, to provide an implementation of both
editing commands and the expected editing behavior on user input.
Responsibility of firing the `input` event is moved from EventHandler to
the Editing API, which also gets rid of duplicate events whenever
dealing with `<input>` or `<textarea>` events.
The `beforeinput` event still needs to be fired by `EventHandler`
however, since that is never fired by `execCommand()`.
The editing command that relies the most on this, `insertLinebreak`,
did not perform a layout update after inserting a `<br>` which caused
this algorithm to always return false. But instead of actually building
the layout tree needlessly, we can check the DOM tree instead.
The spec calls for a couple of very specific whitespace padding
techniques whenever we canonicalize whitespace during the execution of
editing commands, but it seems that other browsers have a simpler
strategy - let's adopt theirs!
We previously had PropertyOwningCSSStyleDeclaration and
ResolvedCSSStyleDeclaration, representing the current style properties
and resolved style respectively. Both of these were the
CSSStyleDeclaration type in the CSSOM. (We also had
ElementInlineCSSStyleDeclaration but I removed that in a previous
commit.)
In the meantime, the spec has changed so that these should now be a new
CSSStyleProperties type in the CSSOM. Also, we need to subclass
CSSStyleDeclaration for things like CSSFontFaceRule's list of
descriptors, which means it wouldn't hold style properties.
So, this commit does the fairly messy work of combining these two types
into a new CSSStyleProperties class. A lot of what previously was done
as separate methods in the two classes, now follows the spec steps of
"if the readonly flag is set, do X" instead, which is hopefully easier
to follow too.
There is still some functionality in CSSStyleDeclaration that belongs in
CSSStyleProperties, but I'll do that next. To avoid a huge diff for
"CSSStyleDeclaration-all-supported-properties-and-default-values.txt"
both here and in the following commit, we don't apply the (currently
empty) CSSStyleProperties prototype yet.
We do not fire `beforeinput` events since other browsers do not seem to
do so either.
The spec asks us to check whether a command's action modified the DOM
tree. This means adding or removing nodes and attributes, or changing
character data anywhere in the tree. We have
`Document::dom_tree_version()` for node updates, but for character data
a new version number is introduced that allows us to easily keep track
of any text changes in the entire tree.
Both Chrome and Firefox return `true` whenever the value string provided
is an invalid color or the current color. Spec issue raised:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/476
We added these methods to propagate OOM errors at process startup, but
we longer fret about these tiny OOM failures. Requiring that these init
methods be called prohibits using these strings in processes that have
not set up a MainThreadVM. So let's just remove them and initialize the
strings in a sane manner.
In doing so, this also standardizes how we initialize strings whose C++
variable name differs from their string value. Instead of special-casing
these strings, we just include their string value in the x-macro list.
