Even though calling delete on a super property will ultimately throw a
ReferenceError, we must return the allocated register for the result of
the delete operation (which would normally be a boolean). If the delete
operation is used in a return statement, the bytecode generator for the
return statement must be able to assume the statement had some output.
From the spec: https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-punctuators
OptionalChainingPunctuator ::
?. [lookahead ∉ DecimalDigit]
We were missing the lookahead and therefore incorrectly treating any
'?.' as TokenType::QuestionMarkPeriod.
Fixes#4409.
- We have to check if the property name is a string before calling
as_string() on it
- We can't as_number() the same property name but have to use the parsed
index number
Fixes#3950.
Two issues:
- throw_exception() with ErrorType::InstanceOfOperatorBadPrototype would
receive rhs_prototype.to_string_without_side_effects(), which would
ASSERT_NOT_REACHED() as to_string_without_side_effects() must not be
called on an empty value. It should (and now does) receive the RHS
value instead as the message is "'prototype' property of {} is not an
object".
- Value::instance_of() was missing an exception check after calling
has_instance_method, to_boolean() on an empty value result would crash
as well.
Fixes#3930.
